Looking into the Minimum Wage



These days there are few things in the world that can be considered universal truths, especially in the current world climate where just about everything under the sun can and has been made into an argument. Despite all the contention in the public discourse there is one fact that seems incredibly difficult to disagree with: It is hard to live without money; especially because with everything in the world, from basics like food and water all the way to the computer or phone you’re reading this on, everything cost a bit of the green stuff. Since July 24, 2009, the United States has had a set national minimum wage of $7.25. However, between significant amounts of research and public pressures, there has been some controversy among lawmakers as to whether or not this minimum is an adequate enough sum to actually live on.
In 2014, Rep. Tim Ryan a Democratic lawmaker from Ohio tried to understand exactly this issue with a social challenge that had gained a lot of popularity during this period. The challenge was simply named the "live the wage challenge,” the rules of which require the participant to only live off of the federal minimum for a week to understand how effectivly someone can live off of the sum. One unforeseen, child related expense later, and Rep. Ryan’s budget was already heavily impacted: “A few hours in and we're already recognizing the challenges." While Rep. Ryan had a powerful safety net to fall back on with his actual paycheck of roughly 11 times the minimum, it is hard to argue with the point his challenge made-- $7.25 isn’t very much to live on at all.
 A popularly proposed solution to the minimum wage’s insufficient nature has been to (perhaps to an extent, simply) raise it. There has been a recent political movement within the last decade to transform the minimum wage into a “living wage,” or in layman’s terms, the ability to earn what they realistically would require for necessities; things such as food and housing. This living wage has gone through various proposed amounts, such as a proposed $10.10 in 2014 by a coalition of economists and $15 a year later, the later a major promise of Senator Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign. Opponents of the living wage argue that businesses would need to make cuts to personnel in order to keep up with the new wage laws, and maybe that is a legitimate concern that needs to be addressed with any new bill. But the status quo of keeping it the same still presents that same issue we started with: It’s not just hard, it’s close to impossible to live without money.
Work Cited:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Domestic Violence within the Homeless Community

Understanding Homelessness

Air pollution caused by wildfires may increase risk of dementia