Native American Children: Historical Trauma and Continued Vulnerability
Native Americans have had a long history of mistreatment
by the hands of “settlers”, mistreatment that did not evaporate with the rise
of the United States or even the turn of the last two centuries. Many may be
aware of the bloody overt aspects of their abuse, but there is another more
pervasive method that has made Native Americans such a vulnerable population.
Since the beginning of the 1900’s there has been a cultural attack on Native
Americans and a primary target has been the children.
Around the beginning of the 20th century, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs began removing Native American children from their
families and forcing them to attend boarding schools off reservation where they
were often treated poorly. “They lumped together tribal groups, which made it
difficult for Native instructors who had to negotiate complex linguistic and
historical tensions.” And most significantly these boarding schools emphasized
assimilation into white culture with little regard to Native traditions. The
results of these schools have had lasting consequences on the individuals
placed in them, their families, and their community.
The
removal and destruction of so many tribal families has created what some call
“historical trauma”. Carol Locust believes that those who have been separated
from their families and tribes experience “Split Feather Syndrome - the damage caused
by loss of tribal identity and growing up ‘different’ in an inhospitable
world”. The repercussions reach far and wide, including the endangerment of
Native languages. Due to years of systematic rejection of their culture by
mainstream America, many parents began to stop teaching their children (or were
not given the option) their own native language. It has reached a point where
fear of Native language extinction could become a possibility without well
executed intervention.
Even
after the abolishment of these boarding schools the shattering of families did
not stop and simply found another way through the foster care and adoption
system. The causes for removal in many cases were questionable at best and had
a lot to do with cultural differences. For example, the collectivist parental
style where an auntie or “aunties” may be caring for the child vs the nuclear
family structures favored by individualist societies. From 1941-1967 the
majority (85%) of Native American children removed from their families were
placed outside of Native American homes, and communities. Great emphasis on
assimilation was placed upon the children with distinct desire to “kill the
Indian, save the man”.
Despite the enactment of the Indian Child
Welfare Act (ICWA) in 1978, Native children are still disproportionately
removed and separated from family in the US. In states like Alaska where only
18% of children are considered Native, 55% of all children in foster care are
Native American (Woodard, 2011). North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Montana,
and Nebraska have similarly disproportionate numbers of native children in
foster care.
Today
there is a lot of controversy over ICWA, either that it isn’t being observed properly
(sometimes being completely ignored), or applied without common sense (e.g,
placing children in unsafe environments). But for many, ICWA isn’t enough or
even the right answer. For example, The Lakota’s People’s Law Project in South
Dakota argues that fosters facilities in South Dakota are simply the “new
Indian boarding schools” and that the proper solution is to have
“Foster/Kinship care run by Lakota, for Lakota”. Ultimately, there is work to
be done to protect these children, protect these families, and to protect the
diverse Native culture from extinction. Enough has been taken already, enough
mistreatment, and reparations are overdue.
-JTS
For More Info:
References:
Baker, B. J. (2015, December 5). When it comes to Native American children, tribes know best.
Newsweek US Edition. http://www.newsweek.com/when-it-comes-native-american-children-tribes-know-best-401165
Lutz, E. L. (2007, June). Saving America’s endangered languages. Cultural Survival Quarterly
Magazine. Retrieved:
https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/saving-americas-endangered-languages
https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/saving-americas-endangered-languages
Martin, P. (2015, October 12). Forced removal of Native American children from parents exposed in 13 minutes. WGBH
Overall, M. (2015, May 15). Dusten Brown makes first public comments since 'Baby Veronica' custody
battle. Tulsa World. http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/dusten-brown-makes-first-public-
Sullivan, L. (2011, October 25). Incentives and cultural bias fuel foster system. NPR.
Sullivan, L. (2011, October 25). Native foster care: Lost children, shattered families. NPR.
Woodard, S. (2011, December 6). Native Americans expose the adoption era and repair its
devastation. Indian
Country Today. https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/news/native-
Comments
Post a Comment